Perfect Crown has now aired its second-to-last episode. After spending much of the story avoiding responsibility, male lead Ian, played by Byeon Woo Seok, finally decides to ascend the throne in order to gain enough power to protect the woman he loves.
However, the coronation scene featured in Episode 11 quickly became the center of controversy, with audiences criticizing what they described as major inaccuracies involving royal traditions, national symbolism, and historical awareness. On May 16, Chosun Ilbo compiled several examples of the drama’s disputed scenes.
One of the biggest points of criticism involved the ceremonial chant used during Ian’s coronation. Instead of shouting “manse,” a phrase symbolizing an independent sovereign nation, the drama used the term “cheonse,” historically associated with tributary or subordinate states. Viewers also pointed out that Ian’s royal crown contained nine bead strands, another symbol historically connected to vassal kingdoms. In contrast, emperors of fully independent nations traditionally wore crowns with twelve bead strands.
Another scene involving female lead Seong Hui Ju, portrayed by IU, also sparked criticism. Viewers argued that a tea ceremony scene with the Queen Dowager appeared heavily influenced by Chinese-style tea rituals rather than Korean royal customs.
Netizens additionally noticed several props allegedly sourced from inexpensive Chinese products. The Queen Dowager was seen using a fountain pen reportedly sold by Chinese company Jinhao for around 10,000 won. Meanwhile, the tea set used in the drama was allegedly found on Chinese e-commerce platforms for approximately 126 yuan. Many viewers criticized the production team for lacking attention to detail, arguing that fictional Korean royal family members using cheap imported props damaged the drama’s credibility.
The controversy intensified because the series is set in an alternate reality where Korea remains a constitutional monarchy and never became part of another nation. Some viewers argued that portraying the fictional kingdom with symbolism associated with subordinate states effectively undermined Korean national dignity.
One viewer commented, “This is dangerous directing that could spread distorted historical perceptions and make viewers misunderstand Korean history as the history of a dependent nation.”
According to reports, some viewers have already submitted official complaints to the Korea Communications Standards Commission, citing Article 25 of broadcasting regulations, which states that programs must not damage national dignity or pride. Complainants are reportedly demanding strict action against the drama over its alleged historical inaccuracies.
At the same time, criticism surrounding the drama’s script has continued to grow online. Many viewers argued that the series relied heavily on the visuals and popularity of its lead actors rather than strong storytelling.
Comments from netizens included reactions such as:
“The visuals are carrying the script. The first episodes were decent, but it became more ridiculous and full of plot holes later on.”
“The script is unbelievably bland. There’s no real political tension at all. It probably only became popular because of the cast.”
“The male and female leads have absolutely no chemistry.”
“The drama keeps using palace fires whenever someone needs to be attacked. It’s repetitive and boring.”
“The script feels genuinely weak. MBC promoted it as an award-winning script, so the disappointment feels even bigger.”
“The coronation makeup looked terrible. The king’s face was overloaded with powder and lipstick.”
Some viewers also questioned the characterization of IU’s role, criticizing how the story portrayed public obsession with her character despite the political instability caused by her actions.
Despite the ongoing backlash, some audiences urged others to wait until the final episode airs before escalating further criticism and legal complaints.
This is not the first time the drama has faced controversy. Earlier in its broadcast run, viewers had already pointed out inconsistencies and unusual depictions involving the series’ fictional constitutional monarchy system.
Meanwhile, on May 16, the production team posted a statement through the drama’s official website, saying, “We sincerely bow our heads in apology to viewers who have supported the drama with affection for causing concern over issues related to world-building and historical authenticity.”
Addressing the criticism, the production team acknowledged viewers’ concerns directly.
The statement read, “We take viewers’ criticism seriously regarding concerns that the drama may have damaged the image of Korea’s independent national status.”
The producers further admitted, “This issue occurred because the production team failed to carefully examine how Joseon royal protocols and ceremonial traditions evolved throughout history.”
The team also apologized for not more closely reviewing the areas where fictional storytelling intersected with real historical context.
In addition, the production staff announced that they plan to revise the controversial scenes as quickly as possible for future rebroadcasts and streaming replay services, including corrections to both audio and subtitles.
Sources: K14, Nate
You must be logged in to post a comment.