On January 13, the Seoul Central District Court’s Civil Division 62 delivered its verdict in ADOR’s civil lawsuit seeking approximately ₩1.1 billion in damages from Dolphiners Films. The dispute stemmed from the unauthorized release of a director’s cut of NewJeans“ETA” music video in August 2024.

Dolphiners Films, which had served as an external video production partner for ADOR, uploaded the director’s cut of the “ETA” music video to its own YouTube channel without obtaining written approval from ADOR. As the copyright holder of NewJeans-related video content, ADOR demanded the video’s removal, citing the lack of prior consent as required under the contract.

newjeans ETA

In response, director Shin Woo Seok of Dolphiners Films unexpectedly deleted all NewJeans-related videos from another unofficial fan channel he operated, known as the “Ban Heesoo channel.” This sudden move sparked backlash from fans, many of whom criticized ADOR after losing access to the content.

Shin Woo Seok’s side argued that there had been a verbal agreement during the tenure of former ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin, claiming the upload of the director’s cut had been approved. ADOR firmly denied this, stating that the video was released without authorization and that no such verbal agreement existed.

The conflict escalated further in November 2024, when Shin Woo Seok filed a criminal complaint, alleging that ADOR’s public statement referring to the upload as “unauthorized” had damaged his reputation. In turn, ADOR filed a civil lawsuit seeking damages for breach of contract.

The image is a document titled "탄원서" (Petition/Plea). **Details extracted from the document:** * **Title:** 탄원서 (Petition) * **Case Number (사건 번호):** 2024가합113399 전속계약유효 확인의 소 (Lawsuit for Confirmation of Exclusive Contract Validity) * **Petitioner (피고):** 김민지, 팜하니, 마쉬다니엘, 강해린, 이혜인 등 5인 (Kim Min-ji, Pham Hani, Ma Xiu Daniel, Kang Hae-rin, Lee Hye-in, and 5 others) * **Respondent/Applicant (탄원인):** 김성수 (680805-1058337), 변희재 (740422-1041723) * **Address (주소):** 서울시 마포구 마포대로 4길 36 2층 (2F, 36, Mapo-daero 4-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul) * **Contact (연락처):** 02-720-8828 * **Section Title:** 탄원 취지 및 탄원인 이력 (Purpose of Petition and Background of Petitioner) * **Content snippet:** 대한민국 진보와 보수 대중문화평론가들이, 재판부에 뉴진스 활동재개를 위한 솔로몬식 해법을 요청드립니다. 대중문화 평론가 김성수, 변희재 드림 (Progressive and conservative pop culture critics of the Republic of Korea request a Solomon-like solution from the court for the resumption of NewJeans' activities. Submitted by pop culture critics Kim Sung-soo, Byun Hee-jae) * **Petitioner Background Snippet (김성수):** 대중문화평론가 김성수 이력(680805-1******) (Pop Culture Critic Kim Sung-soo's background), 서강대학교 철학과 졸업 (Graduated from Sogang University, Philosophy Department), 열린tv 시청자세상 고정 패널 (Fixed panelist on Open TV Viewer's World) **Classification based on people and context:** The document mentions several individuals associated with the K-pop group NewJeans (김민지, 팜하니, 마쉬다니엘, 강해린, 이혜인) and two individuals petitioning (김성수, 변희재) regarding the validity of an exclusive contract, likely related to the group's activities. people-김성수-a-변희재-a-김민지-a-팜하니-a-마쉬다니엘-a-강해린-a-이혜인-a-탄원서-a-뉴진스

During the trial, both parties clashed over whether prior consent had been given, and whether the upload constituted a violation of contractual obligations as well as copyright and portrait rights. The case drew particular attention when Min Hee Jin appeared in court as a witness for Dolphiners Films, marking one of the rare occasions she testified outside of her own stock-related litigation. She maintained that a verbal agreement with Shin Woo Seok had existed, asserting that the upload of the “ETA” director’s cut had been mutually agreed upon.

However, the court did not accept this argument.

In its ruling, the court ordered Dolphiners Films to pay ADOR ₩1 billion, plus interest calculated at an annual rate of 12% from December 14, 2024, until full payment is made. The court dismissed the remaining claims, including ADOR’s separate ₩100 million defamation claim against Shin Woo Seok personally, and outlined the allocation of litigation costs accordingly.

With the court recognizing the breach of contract and awarding the bulk of the claimed damages, the verdict is widely seen as a near-total win for ADOR. Notably, despite testimony referencing “verbal agreements” and industry “customs,” the court emphasized the primacy of written contracts effectively rejecting Min Hee Jin’s claims and reinforcing the legal weight of formal consent procedures.

The ruling marks a significant legal milestone in the ongoing disputes surrounding ADOR and NewJeans-related content, underscoring the importance of contractual compliance in the K-pop industry’s production ecosystem.

Sources: Daum