In the video released on December 16, 2025, Park Na‑rae addressed the ongoing issues by saying, “There are parts that require a calm verification of facts, so legal procedures are underway,” and “I will pause all activities for now to focus on resolving these matters. I will reflect on my responsibilities and attitude. Issues that need time will proceed calmly through the appropriate processes.” The 2 minute and 23 second statement, which contained no apology or further explanation, was criticized immediately after it came out. A YouTuber analyzed Park Na‑rae’s tone and expressions in a video titled “What Happens When You Ignore Nonverbal Communication in Park Na‑rae’s Video.”

The YouTuber noted, “When looking at Park Na‑rae’s greeting, her head lifts before her eyes, and her eyes are drawn upward from below. In a typical greeting or apology, the head and eyes move together with an open gaze. Usually the mouth opens slightly at the start of an apology or explanation, but holding the mouth closed while lifting the head suggests risk‑management mode is already activated.” They added, “In a sincere apology, the head and eyes rise together and the mouth opens slightly. Park Na‑rae’s lower facial expression holds the eyes up looking upward,” and “She presses her lips together immediately after finishing a sentence — a pattern called ‘sentence‑level sealing,’ often used when risk management is maximized, such as during prosecution, trials, or official interviews where a single word might cause harm.”

The analysis continued, stating, “Her overall expression is close to neutral, with facial muscles intentionally fixed. It appears she wants to leave only the words and not the expressions or face. When emotions could lead to disadvantage, this expression is often chosen,” and “If she wanted to hide emotions completely, a handwritten letter or social media post might have been more effective. No matter how much you try to control it, the face and body ultimately leave a message. Even if words are concealed, nonverbal communication is difficult to hide.”

The video, criticized for its sharp tone and lack of apology, is being revisited as trust in Park Na‑rae’s managers begins to fracture. During the process of Park Na‑rae’s alleged abuse and personal information leaks, the managers seemed to gain the upper hand — until public opinion shifted after release of recorded phone calls. The contrasting stances after a call with Park Na‑rae, inflated career claims, and issues with social insurance discrepancies showed content differing from initial allegations.

Netizens revisiting Park Na‑rae’s final statement are now commenting on her attitude, tone, and expression with reactions such as “There was a reason for it,” “She only spoke truth,” “People mocked that she didn’t even have a lawyer,” and “At the time, responding would have turned into a deceptive PR war — so it was wise.”

Amid the release of recorded calls between Park Na‑rae and her former managers, the alleged abuse controversy has reached a new phase. Park Na‑rae has filed complaints against her former managers for attempted blackmail and business embezzlement and completed the complainant investigation, drawing attention to how the legal battle will unfold.

Sources: Nate