Recently, a netizen in theqoo released a post mentioning the relation between ADOR’s sexual harassment case with B’s salary reduction.
According to the article, Min Hee-jin initially released her statement covering the conversation about B’s salary reduction and R&R adjustments, claiming that it was related to work and couldn’t be disclosed.
However, B argued that Min Hee-jin’s statement was edited cleverly. It was later disclosed since it was part of the current case. How can the salary issue be related to the sexual harassment case? It is because it was mentioned in the complaint B sent to HYBE.
After six months of probation, Director A was in charge of giving B the final personnel evaluation and making the conclusion.
Since the incidents involve salary, R&R adjustments, and sexual harassment complaints are closely linked, they are mentioned together.
In response, other netizens commented:
– What do you mean? What does sexual harassment have to do with salary reduction?
– So they are trying to claim the sexual harassment victim of being incompetent to kick her out?
– What salary is okay for one to commit sexual harassment like that?
– Isn’t the company the one that decided on the salary? Even when they gave high salary but the person performed poorly, isn’t it the company’s mistake in hiring the employee? Just because someone is paid high salary and did not perform well doesn’t mean they deserve to be sexually harassed.
– What does this have to do with sexual harassment? Does it help cover up the case?
– Even after reading this, I don’t understand why the salary needs to be disclosed
Source: theqoo
