The controversy surrounding actor Cho Jin-woong has shifted from allegations of a “juvenile crime” to a debate over media responsibility, following his recent announcement of retirement from the entertainment industry.

Attorney Kim Kyung-ho has filed a criminal complaint against Dispatch and its reporters, warning that the media outlet could even face closure over its reporting. The dispute centers on Dispatch’s statement: “It has been confirmed that he faced a criminal trial in his second year of high school.”

Choi Jin-woong

Attorney Kim stressed that Cho Jin-woong was never prosecuted in criminal court; the only legal action was a juvenile protective disposition. The legal distinction is significant: criminal trials leave a permanent record affecting future employment and social evaluation, whereas juvenile protective proceedings are rehabilitative in nature. According to Article 32 of the Juvenile Act, such dispositions do not impact the juvenile’s future personal record.

Despite this, Dispatch reportedly described Cho Jin-woong as having undergone a criminal trial for serious offenses such as robbery and sexual assault, effectively portraying him as a dangerous criminal rather than a rehabilitated juvenile. Kim Kyung-ho argued this misrepresentation violates legal protections, as juvenile proceedings are generally confidential under Article 70 of the Juvenile Act.

Kim Kyung-ho also cited potential civil liability. With Cho Jin-woong retiring, he could claim contractual damages, production losses, and lost future income from projects including dramas, films, and advertisements directly against Dispatch.

cho jin woong controversy response

Beyond the legal battle, the controversy has sparked a broader societal discussion about how juvenile justice and rehabilitation should be perceived. Mislabeling someone as a “serious criminal” decades after receiving juvenile protection undermines the Juvenile Act’s principle that such records should not affect the individual’s future.

How Dispatch’s reporting is evaluated in court could have major implications for celebrity journalism and the standards for reporting juvenile cases in South Korea.

Sources: Naver