bts suga

BTS’s Suga’s Agency Issues Additional Apology “Not Trying to Downplay the Incident with ‘Electric Kickboard’ Term” — Reported by Major International Media

BTS's Suga was recently caught driving under the influence while serving as an alternative service worker, leading to public outrage

The controversy was further fueled when his agency described the vehicle involved as an “electric kickboard”, which some viewed as an attempt to downplay the severity of the incident. In response, the agency issued another apology. The news has also garnered attention from major international media, who expressed concerns, especially as anticipation was building for BTS’s full-group activities next year.

On August 7th, Suga and his agency BigHit Music issued a statement apologizing for the incident. They initially referred to the vehicle as an “electric kickboard”, but the police identified it as an “electric scooter” due to its added seat. According to South Korean traffic laws, electric scooters are classified as “vehicles”, meaning that if someone is caught driving one while intoxicated, they face license suspension or revocation, fines and even criminal charges. The agency clarified, “We described the vehicle as an electric kickboard with a seat, not intending to minimize the seriousness of the situation.” They added, “We apologize for not being more thorough and for hastily making that statement. We will fully comply with any responsibilities as determined by the investigative authorities.

bts suga thumbnail

Following the news of Suga’s DUI, international outlets like The New York Times, Billboard and the BBC covered the story in detail. The New York Times reported that “Suga had his license revoked and was fined after being caught driving a scooter while intoxicated“. The BBC highlighted Suga’s status as an alternative service worker due to his previous shoulder surgery and noted his apology, in which he expressed his willingness to accept any disciplinary action from his workplace.

Suga, currently serving as a public service worker, is scheduled to be discharged in June 2025. Since the incident occurred outside of his working hours, it is unlikely that he will face additional penalties from the Military Manpower Administration.